Sales assets · prospect self-serve

Orbit vs Unity Catalog — savings calculator

Plug in your current stack and get a conservative / midpoint / aggressive annual range with the four-lever breakdown a procurement meeting reads in under a minute. Math recomputes live.

Defaults below are a mid-market fleet. Pick a spend tier to seed the dollar fields, toggle the UC license tier, and the savings range updates on the next keystroke. Every figure traces back to docs/sales/savings-formulas-source.md; confirm against that doc before circulating externally.

Your current stack

Scenario Unity Catalog Bedrock (no UC) Bedrock reuses the same management-overhead math for fleets without Unity Catalog.

Databricks spend tier Seeds UC spend, asset count, and headcount from the documented mid-market bracket. Unity Catalog license tier Enterprise widens absolute UC overpayment (list price + cross-pipeline scope). Collibra annual $ Immuta annual $ Governed data assets (count) Conversation starter. Data + ML engineering headcount People across the prospect's data + AI org.

Your annual savings range

Midpoint $6,662,000

Conservative $5,134,000

Aggressive $35,390,000

Four-lever breakdown

UC license displacement

Cut 8–15% of UC overpayment on list price + cross-pipeline scope.

$92,000

Ancillary tooling consolidation

Reassign 10% of Collibra + Immuta spend to a single runtime policy plane.

$70,000

Engineering hour recovery

$50k–$120k per data+ML engineer per year, plus a data-asset workload multiplier.

$3,000,000

Audit & incident risk reduction

Avoid $2M–$5M per unenforced model-swap or substrate-migration event.

$3,500,000